Ty Rhame of Sterling Currency Group Dinar Banker May Lose House

Ty Rhame might end up losing his house as his assets were seized and he has yet to make a payment on his house since June of 2015.

ty rhame sterling

ty rhame sterling currency group

Peoples Dinar Conference Call

Here is the deleted Peoples Dinar Call where they mentioned the private airport exchange locations:

Ty Rhame worked for Sterling, also known as Dinar Banker, until the FBI raid in June of 2015.

Here are the most recent (August 29, 2016) court documents, various pictures I discovered, and audio from a 2010 call:

Sterling Currency Group Court Case 1:15-cv-02032-LMM

ty rhame sterling currency group the get team

Document 257 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 5

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE REAL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 2255 VALLEY ROAD, N.W. ATLANTA, FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA; et al.,

Defendants.
Civil Case No.: 1:15-cv-2032-LMM
CLAIMANT SABAL’S RESPONSE TO CLAIMANT RHAME’S
MOTION TO APPLY SEIZED FUNDS TO SATISFY SABAL’S NOTE

Claimant Sabal Capital 3, LLC (“Sabal”), by its undersigned attorney, hereby responds to Claimant Tyson Rhame’s (“Rhame”) request that seized funds be used to satisfy Sabal’s note on the Cascades at Rea property (“the property”) instead of an interlocutory sale being used to satisfy Sabal’s note. (Doc. Nos. 246 & 254). As an initial mater, it appears that all parties agree on the following points:

1. The loan from Sabal has been in default for over a year;

2. Sabal’s note on the property should be paid; and

3. Sabal should be paid without further delay.

Case 1:15-cv-02032-LMM Document 257 Filed 08/29/16 Page 2 of 5

The dispute, therefore, resolves around how to best address these points within the framework of asset forfeiture law. Because the fact that Sabal has not been paid for over a year indicates that Rhame will not do so directly, the following are the only remaining options for paying off Sabal’s note without further delay:

1. Sabal gets paid through a court-ordered interlocutory sale (“Interlocutory Sale Option”); or

2. A third party directly pays off Sabal’s note, which is what Rhame wants the United States to do
with seized funds (“Seized Funds Option”).

Based on the parties’ representations during the telephone conference on August 15, 2016, Rhame requests the Seized Funds Option, while all other parties have no objection to the Interlocutory Sale Option. Accordingly, pursuant to the Court’s direction during the telephone conference, attached to this brief is a proposed order for the Interlocutory Sale Option.

dinar guru ty rhame

Sabal seeks an interlocutory sale because it provides certainty. Public interlocutory sales are clearly established in asset forfeiture law. As explained in Sabal’s motion for interlocutory sale (Doc. No. 231 at 5), Rule G(7)(b)(i) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions provides all of the answers to the issues confronting the Court. And, as the many cases cited in Sabal’s motion for interlocutory sale demonstrate, courts routinely

2

dinar iqd team ty rhame dinar banker

Dinar Banker Sterling Currency Group was a BIG supporter of the IQD Team calls.

Case 1:15-cv-02032-LMM Document 257 Filed 08/29/16 Page 3 of 5

chose the Interlocutory Sale Option. (Id. at 6-7)

In contrast, the Seized Funds Option is surrounded by uncertainty. Sabal is unaware of any case taking that route when the United States opposes it, which is happening in this case. Accordingly, Sabal cautions against the uncertainty of further litigation on this issue, which would will result in even more unnecessary delay.

By failing for over a year to make the payments due on the property, Rhame has waived any right he might otherwise have had to claim a right to continue possession of the property. If not for the pendency of this forfeiture action and the resulting prohibition in 21 U.S.C. § 853(k), Sabal would have foreclosed on the property in a state court action long ago. Accordingly, it would be unfair to Sabal to further delay satisfaction of the debt by pursuing an option which would generate additional litigation and uncertainty.

iqd team ty rhame

Respectfully submitted, this 29th day of August, 2016.

/s/ David Stewart David M. Stewart
Ga. Bar No. 142029 CROWDER STEWART LLP
Post Office Box 160 Augusta, Georgia 30903
(706) 434-8799
david@crowderstewart.com

Attorney for Sabal Capital 3, LLC
3

Case 1:15-cv-02032-LMM Document 257 Filed 08/29/16 Page 4 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned certifies pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 that the document to which this certificate is attached has been prepared using Times New Roman, 14 point font. This 29th day of August, 2016.

/s/ David M. Stewart David M. Stewart Ga. Bar No. 142029

Attorney for Sabal Capital 3, LLC

4

5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that I have on this day served all the parties in this case in accordance with the notice of electronic filing (“NEF”) which was generated as a result of electronic filing in this court.
This 29th day of August, 2016.
/s/ David M. Stewart
David M. Stewart Ga. Bar No. 142029
Attorney for Sabal Capital 3, LLC

Case 1:15-cv-02032-LMM Document 257 Filed 08/29/16 Page 5 of 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *